Looting stones is one of the most common stories of ruins. On one hand, ruins have been erased in this manner. On the other, perhaps we should consider this a legitimate activity for ruins. We wrote in our Ruins Criteria that ruins should not suffer from human intervention. By this we mostly meant that attempts to rebuild or preserve ruins ruins the ruins. [not a typo!] But perhaps negative intervention is legitimate. Ruins have always undergone looting. This is part of what makes them ruins.
This is a delicate subject. On one hand, we would like everyone to be able to enjoy the lovely decorated archway. On the other hand, we want everyone to enjoy the lovely ruins. This is one of the many points where archaeology and ruin-ology do not jive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72776/72776e1b534cf5c8cf7cd962d2d9aa7639ab8edd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8678/c867828737bb9f8161c9098196035af49035fefb" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment